Federer
vs. Nadal: Putting Roland Garros in Perspective
- By Steve
Flink
Having just returned
from Paris and another trip to the
French Open, I find myself thinking
quite a bit about the latest battle in
the remarkable rivalry between Roger
Federer and Rafael Nadal. For the third
year in a row, Nadal and Federer clashed
at Roland Garros. Two years ago, they
met in the semifinals. Last year they
faced other in the final. And so it was
again this year as the two best players
on the planet took each other on in the
title match.
On all three occasions, Nadal toppled
Federer in four sets and now the
left-handed Spaniard has secured three
straight French Open championships. He
joins Bjorn Borg as the only player to
win three or more Roland Garros titles
in a row. Why has Nadal won six of seven
clay court meetings with Federer, and
how has he managed to beat such a
towering big match player thrice on the
Paris clay? To me, the answer is not
that complicated. The recurring image
that keeps flashing in my mind is that
of Federer’s contact point off both
sides during these matches.
Time and again, Nadal forces Federer to play those impossibly high balls off both sides. The pattern which works best for Nadal is his heavy topspin crosscourt forehand which goes to Federer’s backhand. Federer is not confident trying to respond with slice backhands, so he goes for the topspin backhand and misses constantly. Otherwise, the Swiss makes a short reply, which Nadal demolishes with his inside-out, flattened-out forehand. Some critics contend that Federer needs to force the issue more, to attack with more conviction and regularity, to take Nadal out of his comfort zone.
That is easier said than done. Nadal’s shots are bounding so high and often landing so deep that it is an arduous task for Federer to find a way to get in. He did selectively serve-and-volley at unexpected moments. He did try some variation of his own from the baseline, angling his backhand sharply crosscourt to take Nadal off the court when the Spaniard was looking for Federer to go to his backhand. Federer also attempted some high trajectory topspin shots which forced Nadal to reach up uncomfortably for his two-hander, and the Spaniard missed his share of those.
The bottom line is that Nadal largely
controls the tempo in his clay court duels
with Federer. Much was made out of Federer
failing to convert 16 of 17 break point
opportunities, with ten of those missed
opportunities occurring in the first set.
Many felt that Federer might have prevailed
had he broken Nadal in the opening set and
thus moved out in front. But last year, he
did take his early chances, sweeping through
the first set 6-1. Nadal still came back to
take the next three sets. Federer needed
that first set in many ways while Nadal did
not.
And yet, Federer still came back gamely to
win a hard fought second set. He was back to
one set all, and in essence a brand new,
best of three set match had begun. But
Federer was clearly drained by nearly two
hours of strenuous rallies with his
adversary. He was thoroughly outplayed the
last two sets by a stronger and more durable
opponent. Nadal closed out that contest with
growing assurance, winning comfortably
6-3,4-6,6-3,6-4. He won 16 of his last 18
service points after saving a break point in
the second game of the fourth set.
So now Nadal holds an 8-4 lead in this
career series. On surfaces other than clay,
Federer has a 3-2 edge. The hope here is
that Nadal finds a way to finish this year
with more energy and effectiveness. A year
ago, after losing the Wimbledon final to
Federer, Nadal never made it to another
final the rest of the year. Federer lost
only one more match after Wimbledon, and the
rivalry between these two great players
fizzled. They had played each other five
times through Wimbledon in 2006, but met
only once more as the Spaniard lost his
edge.
I don’t expect anything like that to happen
again this year. Federer is surely the big
favorite to win a fifth consecutive
Wimbledon crown, and he will be the favorite
at the U.S. Open as well. In New York, he
will go for a fourth title in a row. But
Nadal is fully capable of making it back to
the Wimbledon final, and is long overdue to
show us his best stuff in New York. If Nadal
does not get injured or exhausted--- those
are two big ifs-- he has an opportunity to
chase Federer down to the wire for the 2007
No. 1 world ranking.
Federer is nearly five years older than
Nadal. He will be 26 in August. Nadal has
just turned 21. So there is still at least a
three year window for these two to stage
some classics, as long as Nadal plays the
kind of hard court tennis that brought him
the Masters Series title at Indian Wells
back in March. I hope over these next few
years that this rivalry will grow into
something of lasting value and become a
great historical series.
The estimable Australians Rod Laver and Ken
Rosewall had a stirring series starting in
1963 (when Laver turned pro) extending into
the 1970’s with some classic contests, most
notably their final round epic at Dallas in
1972 when Rosewall recouped from 3-5 down in
the final set tie-break to win four points
in a row for the title at the WCT Finals.
The left-handed Laver’s explosive game
blended beautifully with Rosewall’s pure
shot making and incomparable sliced
backhand.
From 1978-81, Bjorn Borg and John McEnroe
celebrated a sparkling rivalry that ended at
7-7. Like Federer and Nadal now, they
towered above the field in their time. They
met in back-to-back finals at Wimbledon and
the U.S. Open in 1980 and 1981, with Borg
overcoming McEnroe in the 1980 Wimbledon
final 1-6,7-5,6-3,6-7(16-18),8-6. I am among
those who believe that was the greatest
tennis match of all time. It was always a
delight to watch these two men of sharply
contrasting styles in combat against each
other, with McEnroe always coming forward
and Borg countering with his astonishing
passing shots.
In a very similar way, Martina Navratilova
and Chris Evert captured the public
imagination in their unsurpassed series from
1973-88. These two all time greats played
each other no fewer than 80 times in that
span, with Navratilova victorious 43 times.
They battled against each other 14 times in
major finals. Like Borg and McEnroe, a big
battle of wills and contrasting playing
methodology was showcased whenever Evert and
Navratilova clashed as Martina imposed her
supreme attacking style while Chris answered
with her precise and unerring ground game
and glorious passing shots.
From 1989-2002, Pete Sampras and Andre
Agassi brought their appealingly different
personalities and playing styles into the
arena against each other. Agassi had perhaps
the best return of serve of all time while
Sampras was arguably the finest server the
game has ever seen. Sampras was the premier
serve-and-volleyer and Agassi was the
quintessential baseliner. Sampras was
victorious in 20 of 34 meetings, defeating
Agassi twice at Wimbledon and four times
(including three finals) at the U.S. Open.
Whenever they played, the atmosphere was
electric.
Will Nadal and Federer
reach the lofty level of these other
historic rivalries? Only time will tell.
They have moved into the fourth year of
their series, and they have met in majors
for three straight years. They play the game
so differently that it is always fascinating
to watch them probing in their duels.
Federer’s elegant artistry is always
challenged by Nadal’s speed and topspin
wizardry. It will be up to Nadal to take it
all to another level. He must prove that he
belongs on the other surfaces, show that he
can earn the right to play Federer more
often on faster courts, demonstrate that he
has the necessary versatility. I believe he
will.