I have had a week to digest the final of Roland Garros, and still it boggles my mind. Rafael Nadal’s 6-1, 6-3, 6-0 triumph over Roger Federer was stupendous in many ways. He made 11 unforced errors in those three nearly impeccable sets. In 11 Federer service games, Nadal broke his adversary 8 times. In two of the three games Federer managed to hold serve, the world No. 1 had to recover from match point down. And yet, Federer did not serve badly by any means; he made good on 68% of his first deliveries.

The bottom line is that Federer suffered the single most decisive loss of his entire career at the Grand Slam events. In 173 matches over a span of 10 years, Federer had never had anyone beat him that soundly. Moreover, he had not lost a 6-0 set since 1999. The remarkable thing was that Federer was such a discouraged figure in the end. After dropping those first two sets--- and making a concerted effort to get back into the second set as he recovered from 2-0 down to reach 3-3---- it was apparent from the early stages of the third set that the 26-year-old Swiss was almost devoid of hope. Since 2003--- when he won his first major at Wimbledon--- I have never seen Federer in such a state of despondency.

He did not give up and he stayed on the job as best he could, but his mannerisms told the whole story. He knew Nadal was not going to take his foot off the accelerator and he seemed almost fatalistic about the outcome. Nadal was simply playing clay court tennis of the highest order, and his level of play was decidedly higher than anything he had produced in his three previous winning campaigns at Roland Garros. I do not make that assessment lightly. Nadal did, after all, perform exceedingly well at Roland Garros from 2005-2007. But never in that stretch did he set the tempo from the baseline with such unrelenting aggression. 

Nadal became the first man since Bjorn Borg in 1980 to rule at Roland Garros without losing a set across the fortnight. That is no mean feat. Not only did he dismantle Federer in the final round, but he had to beat Novak Djokovic in the semifinals. Djokovic had raised his clay court game to a much higher level this year than in the past, winning the Italian Open, playing a superb match against Nadal in the semifinals of Hamburg. But he was taken apart at Roland Garros by his Spanish adversary 6-4, 6-2, 7-6 (3) as the clay court master dictated for large stretches of the contest.

Djokovic somehow worked his way back into the third set from 3-0 and two service breaks down. He began going for the lines fearlessly and his return of serve was hit consistently with extraordinary depth. Nadal led 5-3 and served for the match at 5-4 in the third, but Djokovic steadfastly went after that set, and nearly found a way to take it. With Nadal serving at 5-6, Djokovic had a set point that Nadal wiped away with a sharply angled forehand winner crosscourt. In the tie-break, playing with the wind at his back, Nadal collected the first six points and held on from there to finish it off.

All credit must go to Nadal for knocking out Djokovic and Federer back to back without conceding a set. He has now secured four titles in a row at the French Open, a feat previously realized only by Borg. Nadal is only 22. He should have five more good opportunities to win the three titles he would need to break Borg’s men’s record of six championships. I like his chances.

As for the women in Paris, Ana Ivanovic--- the No. 2 seed--- was a worthy champion. She did a nice job in the final of fending off Dinara Safina. Safina had upended No. 1 seed Maria Sharapova, No. 7 Elena Dementieva and No. 4 Svetlana Kuznetsova. She was on quite a run. Against both Sharapova and Dementieva, Safina had rallied gamely from a set and 5-2 down to win in three set skirmishes. She recovered from match point down in both contests, and then handled 2006 finalist Kuznetsova in straight sets. But Ivanovic was too good on defense against Safina. When they went toe to toe and both women were hitting the ball big off both sides, Safina almost held her own. But she was not as flexible as Ivanovic, and in the end that made all the difference.

Ivanovic--- who won a stirring three set contest from her Serbian countrywoman Jelena Jankovic in the penultimate round--- can be proud of that effort. After leading by a set and 3-1, Ivanovic fell behind 3-1 in the final set, and lost her serve to trail 4-3 as well. But she came through deservedly for a 6-4, 3-6, 6-4 victory that was probably more gratifying in its way than the win in the final. I have a feeling Ivanovic will win her share of big prizes in the years ahead. She has a great match playing temperament, a top of the line ground game, a match playing maturity that is impressive, and an immense will to win. This woman is surely going places, and she is only 20.

I believe Rafael Nadal is going to win his fourth French Open in a row at Roland Garros this year. The indefatigable Spaniard has never lost a match at the world’s premier event. He has won three of the four clay court events he played on his way to Paris, including Masters Series crowns in Monte Carlo and Hamburg. He beat Roger Federer in the finals of both Monte Carlo and Hamburg, and held back Novak Djokovic in the penultimate round at Hamburg. He is primed to take this title again. Among the women, the surprise retirement of Justine Henin makes this tournament difficult to forecast. But I believe that 2002 champion Serena Williams will win this event again on the slow red clay.

Let’s look at the draws. The key question was always this: would Australian Open champion Novak Djokovic end up on Nadal’s or Federer’s half of the draw? The answer was good news for the world’s top ranked player. Djokovic is in the same half with Nadal, so they figure to meet for the second year in a row in the semifinal round. Federer has an essentially kind draw. He opens against Sam Querrey, the big server from California. On the Centre Court of Wimbledon or in Ashe Stadium at the U.S. Open, Querrey could give Federer some problems on a given day. But I don’t see him being able to stay with Federer in the rallies at Roland Garros, and he won’t do enough damage with his serve. Federer will win in straight sets.

Federer might have to deal with Mario Ancic in the third round. Ancic, of course, is the last man to beat Federer at Wimbledon. He stopped Federer in 2002 on the grass. But if they meet on the clay, Federer has a distinct advantage and would prevail in four sets. Juan Monaco or Ivo Karlovic are potential fourth round opponents for Federer. Monaco would be the tougher of the two and could make him work harder. Karlovic would push the world No. 1 into a tie-break or two. But, either way, Federer would advance in straight sets.

In the quarters, Federer might come up against his Davis Cup teammate Stanislas Wawrinka, but three other loom in that section: 2007 Australian Open finalist Fernando Gonzalez, Igor Andreev, and No. 8 seed Richard Gasquet. I can’t see Gasquet getting that far. He has played abysmally as of late. Perhaps the French crowd could spur him on, but he would need to win four matches to earn the right to meet Federer. That is unlikely. Federer will probably play Gonzalez in the quarters, and that would be a legitimate clay court test. But Federer would get through it in four sets, setting up a semifinal meeting with Nikolay Davydenko (the No. 4 seed), Radek Stepanek (who just beat the Swiss maestro in Rome), or David Ferrer (the No. 5 seed from Spain).

If he takes on Davydenko, Federer wins in four sets. If he is up against Ferrer, Federer advances in straight sets. And if he has a chance to avenge his loss to Stepanek, he will do so in four sets. So I see Federer making the final without being stretched to his limits.

On the bottom half, Nadal should comfortably make his way through the first three rounds. His fourth round opponent should be either Mikhail Youzhny or countryman Fernando Verdasco. He could drop a set to either man, but no more. In the quarterfinals, the seedings tell us Nadal should take on No. 6 seed David Nalbandian. If that were the case, Nadal could have a relatively tough match on his hands against a man who beat him twice decisively last fall indoors. But I don’t see Nalbandian living up to expectations. I see Spaniard Nicolas Almagro--- the No. 19 seed--- defeating No. 10 Andy Murray in the third round and blazing along to a last eight meeting with Nadal. He would keep Nadal out there for quite a while, and really push him hard. But Nadal would prevail in four sets.

Then we would have the mouth-watering prospect of Nadal versus Djokovic in the semifinals. In my view, Djokovic will move comfortably through his section of the draw. The left-handed Denis Gremelmayr will be his first round opponent. Gremelmayr played well in Estoril (taking a set off Federer in the semifinals) and in Barcelona, where he also reached the penultimate round. But Djokovic has the solid foundation from the baseline to handle the German. He might play former champion Carlos Moya in the round of 16 and could take on either James Blake or Janko Tipsarevic in the quarters. If he faces Blake, Djokovic could be tested and might lose a set, but ultimately he would prevail.

The last Nadal-Djokovic clash was stupendously played by both men in Hamburg. Nadal won 7-5, 2-6, 6-2 but Djokovic led 3-0,15-40 in the opening set, which was the key to the outcome. If he can replicate that level this time around in Paris, it would be a riveting match. In the final analysis, though, I see Nadal coming through in four sets. He has the clear edge in a best of five set match. It was challenging enough for Djokovic to stay with Nadal for three hours on a best of three set skirmish in Hamburg; in a best of five showdown at Roland Garros, Djokovic would probably have to blitz the Spaniard in straight sets. I think that will beyond his capabilities.

So then Nadal would confront Federer for the fourth year in a row at Roland Garros. In 2005, Nadal toppled Federer in a four set semifinal. In 2006 and 2007, he stopped Federer in four set finals. And now he has defeated the Swiss in eight of nine career clay court head-to-head battles. This time around, I envision Nadal winning yet another four set clash over his rival. Nadal is the best clay court player in the world. There were stretches in both Monte Carlo and Hamburg when Federer briefly controlled the tempo of those contests and held the upper hand by shortening the exchanges from the back of the court, and charging forward to end points commandingly at the net.

In Monte Carlo, Federer lost 7-5, 7-5, but was serving for a 5-3 first set lead and was ahead 4-0 in the second. In Hamburg, Federer was serving at 5-1 with a set point before Nadal won seven games in a row. Then Federer led 5-2 in the second set. Nadal rallied to 5-5 and had Federer down 0-40 in the eleventh game before Federer admirably served his way out of a daunting corner. Federer managed to win that set in a tie-break, but Nadal was clearly the better player in the third set, winning 7-5, 6-7 (3), 6-3. Federer said later that he felt fine physically throughout that contest, but he looked ragged at times in the final set from the baseline.

In any event, it is awfully difficult for Federer to dictate for long stretches against the indomitable Nadal. Nadal eventually starts dominating with his astonishing forehand, pounding away at Federer’s backhand, opening up opportunities to use his inside-out forehand as the finishing shot. When Nadal is controlling play in that fashion, Federer is decidedly at bay. So I am looking for another Nadal four set win in the final this year, with Federer winning the second set.

Maria Sharapova is the top seeded woman. She could have a mighty struggle on her hands in the round of 16 against Dinara Safina. Safina recently won Berlin, defeating Henin and Serena Williams in that event. She upended Sharapova in the round of 16 at Roland Garros in 2006. Sharapova will need to be at her best to avoid another loss to her countrywoman. I believe she will scrape through in three sets. In the quarters, Sharapova would conceivably take on Elena Dementieva. Dementieva has a win over Sharapova this year. She would be confident about her chances on the clay. But, in the crunch, I like Sharapova’s chances. Sharapova wins in three sets.

In the semifinals, Sharapova could meet Svetlana Kuznetsova, the No. 4 seed and the runner-up to Henin at Roland Garros two years ago. That would be a fascinating battle of wills and skills. Kuznetsova would not be daunted by the prospect of playing Sharapova in a major semifinal. If this was a final, I would go with Sharapova. But since it is a semifinal, and because I expect Sharapova to be drained by this stage after some tough tests along the way, I pick Kuznetsova to reach the final.

On the opposite half, No. 5 seed Serena Williams and No. 2 Ana Ivanovic figure to meet in a stirring quarterfinal. All in all, Serena has enjoyed a terrific season in 2008. Clay may well be her least favorite surface--- as is the case with Sharapova--- but Serena has a big psychological edge over Ivanovic, who has not played well as of late. Serena will win in straight sets to reach the penultimate round.

Meanwhile, No. 8 seed Venus Williams, who has never won the French Open, could well meet Jelena Jankovic in the quarterfinals. This is one of the most appealing match-ups in the women’s game. They have played their share of top notch contests against each other. At the U.S. Open last year, Venus won a stirring encounter in a third set tie-break over Jankovic in the quarterfinals. At Roland Garros a year ago, Jankovic beat Venus in a three set, third round appointment. This year, Jankovic should have the edge on the clay again. I believe she will prevail in another three set showdown.

At the Australian Open this year, a sub-par Serena was ushered out of the tournament by a composed and purposeful Jankovic. Serena retaliated with a victory over Jankovic in the final of Miami. Serena became strangely apprehensive in that contest after building a 6-1, 5-3 lead, limping home in three sets. She nearly beat herself that day by imploding with nerves. At Roland Garros, I expect her to be calmer and just as resolute. Serena should hold off Jankovic in a well played, three set encounter.

That would put Serena Williams up against Svetlana Kuznetsova in the championship match. Kuznetsova is fully capable of beating Williams at certain times in certain places. But this will not be the time or the place for the Russian to succeed. Kuznetsova did win the U.S. Open in 2004, but has lost two major finals since. She is not a very good big occasion player. Serena has won eight of ten major finals. Only Venus Williams (at the 2001 U.S. Open), and Sharapova (at the 2004 Wimbledon), have beaten Serena in major finals. She will come out firing from the outset of this final. Kuznetsova will try to fend her off, but to no avail. In the end, Serena Williams wins her ninth Grand Slam championship with a straight set triumph.